youtube question
#21
Posted 29 September 2006 - 11:31 PM
#22
Posted 30 September 2006 - 10:00 AM
Ryan, people still have to go there and will probably view before downloading, then they will continue viewing and following related links as usual. They are not mutually exclusive, quite the opposite. You may go to download and stick around or you may go to view and stick around. Either way, they still have you as a sort of captive audience.You aren't getting what I am saying.
When you stream/view it you are using a viewer which advertises for YouTube. When you download, watch later, or embed you are breaking YouTube's policy because you are showing the direct video, NOT the YouTube Advertised one with links back to YouTube.
They make NO money. Watch the news.
Will you have to go back 10 times to view it again? No.
They are saving bandwidth right there.
#23
Posted 30 September 2006 - 12:59 PM
You make a point with your download and now go-back-and-view-10-times thing, but generally a direct link is always used for evil. (Take the number of "media" websites that yell at you for right clicking)
#24
Posted 30 September 2006 - 01:07 PM
So...what you're saying is that guns don't kill people...people do, right?The thing is that if you manage to get a download link for a video, you have a direct link to that video. Direct linking means that people could put the video as a normal non-YouTube video on another website, but it still streams it from youtube. This is why youtube encodes things so well, so where you're not supposed to get access to this link.
You make a point with your download and now go-back-and-view-10-times thing, but generally a direct link is always used for evil. (Take the number of "media" websites that yell at you for right clicking)
#25
Posted 01 October 2006 - 07:24 PM
#26
Posted 01 October 2006 - 07:45 PM
#27
Posted 01 October 2006 - 08:51 PM
If you all choose to pass this information around to person to person, please do it elsewhere.
Thank you.