Cards
#1
Posted 03 May 2005 - 12:22 PM
#2
Posted 03 May 2005 - 01:33 PM
However, if you have a high-end video card, then you can probably play the game at 1024x768 resolution or maybe even 1280x1024, with all the effects/details turned all the way up. And the graphics will be a lot smoother as well.
It really depends on the game...some games are REALLY graphics intensive (i.e. Doom3), and the better the card you have, the smoother & better looking the game will be.
In a nutshell, it comes down to how much detail you want on your screen. The better & higher quality detail you want, the more difficult it is for the video card to process & display everything. The quality of the video card determines just HOW fast it can process & display the images.
So it sounds to me that you have possibly $250 to upgrade your video card (since you were thinking you had to upgrade two different things initially)? I'm thinking you have an AGP video card currently? That'll get you either a Radeon 9800 Pro, Geforce 6800, or Geforce 6600GT.
#3
Posted 03 May 2005 - 01:54 PM
#4
Posted 03 May 2005 - 02:15 PM
#5
Posted 03 May 2005 - 06:28 PM
Radeon 9600XT w/256MB $110
#6
Posted 03 May 2005 - 06:51 PM
Like ive got a NVidia Geforce FX 5500 128MB... what would be enhanced if i had a 5500 with 256MB?
#7
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:32 PM
#8
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:47 PM
#9
Posted 07 May 2005 - 05:10 PM
#10
Posted 08 May 2005 - 02:05 PM
whoa whoa I have had nothing but ATI cards and had no problems.I use a 6800gt on my 2.666 intel, with 256mb ram on card and 1gb on the mobol. I can run bf at full no lag whatsoever. I would advise you to stay away from ATI since i have 4 of them and ive had some serious issues with there drivers, but i might just have really bad luck . This (click here) is pretty sweet. im gonna buy that for my bro's computer and try it out on his, ill tell you how it runs
#12
Posted 08 May 2005 - 08:50 PM
#13
Posted 09 May 2005 - 09:43 PM
The bad news. CS runs horribly with it. I get around 15 to 25 fps if I'm lucky during a firefight. I would highly suggest if your only playing BF and don't plan on playing a new game soon then stick with whatever is cheapest.
You can get something below the 9600xt and still get great performance for alot cheaper. The new games are very, very demanding so I would suggest saving up to get a damned good card otherwise if you MUST have one now then look for the best bang for your buck.
#14
Posted 10 May 2005 - 12:46 AM
I would personally go with a 9600xt best bang for the buck. And check it out at newegg.com. Sapphire has a good 256mb 9600, my last card, worked like a champI currently have the card that Dons speaking of. For BF it will run it at max everything with no lag nothing no matter what happens. Thats the good news.
The bad news. CS runs horribly with it. I get around 15 to 25 fps if I'm lucky during a firefight. I would highly suggest if your only playing BF and don't plan on playing a new game soon then stick with whatever is cheapest.
You can get something below the 9600xt and still get great performance for alot cheaper. The new games are very, very demanding so I would suggest saving up to get a damned good card otherwise if you MUST have one now then look for the best bang for your buck.
#15
Posted 10 May 2005 - 12:55 AM
Till those cards come out, I suggest not buying any video cards. But once the new generation cards come out, be sure to hit your stores because most prices drop 25-40% like every other piece of obsolete computer hardware.
Can't wait till I get my hands on an r520 chip... I'm gonna go nuts. (Hoping for 512mb versions, woohoo...)
#16
Posted 10 May 2005 - 04:22 AM
#17
Posted 10 May 2005 - 07:48 AM
Housen, you want a video card tester...go and run Flightsim 2004 with AI Traffic bumped up to 100% along with the real weather and dynamic clouds..whoo, now that is a test for any video card.
#18
Posted 10 May 2005 - 09:28 AM
I run a dual-xeon system with a gig of ram and a 6600 (This is the workstation 2 which I do not game with) , but even with that I occassionally get problems with triangular texture bugs and whatnot. I believe I might have bought a cheap-a$$ manufacturer board. And what's surprising is that on my other comp (which I normally use) which has a 1.7-GHz Pen4 and a Ti 4600, there are absolutely no problems with graphics. Same thing on my Mac G4 Cube (1.4Ghz, nVIDIA Geforce 3 ) BF1942 has no problems.
I recommend you buy a card from a good maker, for example, Sapphire as someone already said or if you can afford it the pure ATI manufactured ones. (nVIDIA, most of them are OK, some such as Sparkle you should avoid, just because theyre cheap doesn't mean they're good.)
It's hard to calculate the balance between the CPU and the video card. For example, a 3GHz Pentium 4 with onboard 3D (such as Sis 661 FX) will fare on average about the same as a 2 GHz with a Geforce 4 MX. I hate to say this, but the card you have currently (FX 5200) was not designed for gaming, it is the mainstream card. If you plan to use nVIDIA I would recommend either the FX 5600/5700 Ultra (NEVER get the LE for any nVIDIA cards, they're not worth it.) or the FX 5900. Both are usually available for below $125. As for 128MB/256MB, 256MB is the better choice. Also, try to get the DDR2 version if it's in your price range--they're a bit faster.
If you don't want to keep upgrading your card every few years, though I would get the top-of-the line ones such as Radeon X700/X800 or Geforce 6600/6800. (Of course it depends, I am graduating high school soon so I probably will get my computer much later, so I won't buy a high-end one for the moment. I'll wait until I have the money and time.)
And as Ryu-XD said, technology is advancing exponentially at the moment. As soon as you got the new best top-of-the-line card in several months there's a new one. It's up to you to decide if you want to wait some more for prices to go down or just get it now.
Sorry for the super-long post. Hope it gave you some advice.
#19
Posted 12 May 2005 - 08:09 PM
I have a 6800gt by PNY, and im loving it. Never get lag, i run CS at full. My bro said hed
buy it from me this fall, some hopefully new cards by nvidia will be out
#20
Posted 07 June 2005 - 08:21 PM
My personal recommendation would be an AGP 6600GT for a little less than $200 if you can afford it.
If you can't, try to land a 9600XT or a 9500Pro, preferably the latter, as I'm pretty sure it has 8 pixel pipes.